Sunday, December 18, 2011

Last U.S. troops leave Iraq, ending war (Reuters)

K-CROSSING, Kuwait (Reuters) ? The last convoy of U.S. soldiers pulled out of Iraq on Sunday, ending nearly nine years of war that cost almost 4,500 American and tens of thousands of Iraqi lives, and left a country grappling with political uncertainty.

The war launched in March 2003 with missiles striking Baghdad to oust President Saddam Hussein closes with a fragile democracy still facing insurgents, sectarian tensions and the challenge of defining its place in an Arab region in turmoil.

As U.S. soldiers pulled out, Iraq's delicate power-sharing deal for , Sunni and Kurdish factions was already under pressure. The Shi'ite-led government asked parliament to fire the Sunni deputy prime minister, and security sources said the Sunni vice president faced an arrest warrant.

The final column of around 100 mostly U.S. military MRAP armoured vehicles carrying 500 U.S. troops trundled across the southern Iraq desert from their last base through the night and daybreak along an empty highway to the Kuwaiti border.

Honking their horns, the last batch of around 25 American military trucks and tractor trailers carrying Bradley fighting vehicles crossed the border early on Sunday morning, their crews waving at fellow troops along the route.

"I just can't wait to call my wife and kids and let them know I am safe," Sgt. First Class Rodolfo Ruiz said as the border came into sight. Soon afterwards, he told his men the mission was over, "Hey guys, you made it."

For U.S. President Barack Obama, the military pullout is the fulfilment of an election promise to bring troops home from a conflict inherited from his predecessor, the most unpopular war since Vietnam and one that tainted America's standing worldwide.

For Iraqis, though, the U.S. departure brings a sense of sovereignty tempered by nagging fears their country may slide once again into the kind of sectarian violence that killed many thousands of people at its peak in 2006-2007.

Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's Shi'ite-led government still struggles with a delicate power-sharing arrangement between Shi'ite, Kurdish and Sunni parties, leaving Iraq vulnerable to meddling by Sunni Arab nations and Shi'ite Iran.

The extent of those divisions was clear on Sunday when Maliki asked parliament for a vote of no confidence against Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq, and security sources and lawmakers said an arrest warrant had been issued for Tareq al-Hashemi, one of Iraq's two vice presidents.

Hashemi and Mutlaq are Iraq's two most-senior Sunni politicians. The security sources said only intervention by Sunni and Shi'ite politicians had blocked Hashemi's arrest after he was linked to terrorism by four bodyguards.

The intensity of violence and suicide bombings has subsided. But a stubborn Sunni Islamist insurgency and rival Shi'ite militias remain a threat, carrying out almost daily attacks, often on Iraqi government and security officials.

Iraq says its forces can contain the violence but they lack capabilities in areas such as air defence and intelligence gathering. A deal for several thousand U.S. troops to stay on as trainers fell apart over the sensitive issue of legal immunity.

For many Iraqis, security remains a worry - but no more than jobs and getting access to power in a country whose national grid provides only a few hours of electricity a day despite vast oil potential.

U.S. and foreign companies are already helping Iraq develop the world's fourth-largest oil reserves, but its economy needs investment in all sectors, from hospitals to infrastructure.

"We don't think about America... We think about electricity, jobs, our oil, our daily problems," said Abbas Jaber, a government employee in Baghdad. "They (Americans) left chaos."

GOING HOME

After Obama announced in October that troops would come home by the end of the year as scheduled, the number of U.S. military bases was whittled down quickly as hundreds of troops and trucks carrying equipment headed south to Kuwait.

U.S. forces, which had ended combat missions in 2010, paid $100,000 a month to tribal sheikhs to secure stretches of the highways leading south to reduce the risk of roadside bombings and attacks on the last convoys.

Only around 150 U.S. troops will remain in the country attached to a training and cooperation mission at the huge U.S. embassy on the banks of the Tigris river.

At the height of the war, more than 170,000 U.S. troops were in Iraq at more than 500 bases. By Saturday, there were fewer than 3,000 troops, and one base - Contingency Operating Base Adder, 300 km (185 miles) south of Baghdad.

At COB Adder, as dusk fell before the departure of the last convoy, soldiers slapped barbecue sauce on slabs of ribs brought from Kuwait and laid them on grills beside hotdogs and sausages.

Earlier, 25 soldiers sat on folding chairs in front of two armoured vehicles watching a five-minute ceremony as their brigade's flags were packed up for the last time before loading up their possessions and lining up their trucks.

The last troops flicked on the lights studding their MRAP vehicles and stacked flak jackets and helmets in neat piles, ready for the final departure for Kuwait and then home.

"A good chunk of me is happy to leave. I spent 31 months in this country," said Sgt. Steven Schirmer, 25, after three tours of Iraq since 2007. "It almost seems I can have a life now, though I know I am probably going to Afghanistan in 2013. Once these wars end I wonder what I will end up doing."

NEIGHBOURS KEEP WATCH

Iran and Turkey, major investors in Iraq, will be watching with Gulf nations to see how their neighbour handles its sectarian and ethnic tensions, as the crisis in Syria threatens to spill over its borders.

The fall of Saddam allowed the long-suppressed Shi'ite majority to rise to power. The Shi'ite-led government has drawn the country closer to Iran and Syria's Bashar al-Assad, who is struggling to put down a nine-month-old uprising.

Iraq's Sunni minority is chafing under what it sees as the increasingly authoritarian control of Maliki's Shi'ite coalition. Some local leaders are already pushing mainly Sunni provinces to demand more autonomy from Baghdad.

The main Sunni-backed political bloc Iraqiya said on Saturday it was temporarily suspending its participation in the parliament to protest against what it said was Maliki's unwillingness to deliver on power-sharing.

A dispute between the semi-autonomous Kurdish region and Maliki's central government over oil and territory is also brewing, and is a potential flashpoint after the buffer of the American military presence is gone.

"There is little to suggest that Iraq's government will manage, or be willing, to get itself out of the current stalemate," said Gala Riani, an analyst at IHS Global Insight.

"The perennial divisive issues that have become part of the fabric of Iraqi politics, such as divisions with Kurdistan and Sunni suspicions of the government, are also likely to persist."

(Additional reporting by Rania El Gamal, Suadad al-Salhy and Serena Chaudhry in Baghdad; Writing by Patrick Markey in Baghdad; Editing by Peter Graff)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/world/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111218/wl_nm/us_iraq_withdrawal

nigel tufnel day black friday deals molokai molokai ashton kutcher twitter sandusky barbados

Watch: Saluting Kids Whose Moms and Dads Are Deployed During the Holidays

Jill Biden, wife of the Vice President, invites a group of fourth graders to the Vice President's residence, including Jimmy Blain, whose dad is currently serving in Afghanistan.

Source: http://www.ivillage.com/jill-biden-salutes-military-kids-whose-parents-are-deployed-during-holidays/1-h-411733?dst=iv%3AiVillage%3Ajill-biden-salutes-military-kids-whose-parents-are-deployed-during-holidays-411733

when is daylight savings time 2011 renaissance festival melanie iglesias catherine tate theo epstein theo epstein darknet

Friday, December 16, 2011

Why psychiatrists should mind their language

Allen Frances, contributor

9780674047396-lg.jpgRichard Noll's American Madness: The rise and fall of dementia praecox is the history of the old name for schizophrenia, showing the problems with such labels

"WE DON'T see things as they are, we see things as we are." This simple Talmudic saying summarises the essence of epistemology. Psychiatric disorders provide a striking example: they are not real things in nature, but labels we create to describe troubling aspects of human experience.

Sometimes labels take on a life of their own. People mistakenly think that naming a psychiatric problem shapes it into a simple disease with a reductionist, biological explanation. Labelling mental disorders is useful in providing a common language and guide to treatment. But psychiatric disorders are remarkably heterogeneous and overlapping in their presentations and complex in their causation. The human brain rarely reveals its secrets in simple answers.

All of which brings us to the wonderful book, American Madness, an artful analysis of the rise and fall of the label "dementia praecox" from its promising birth in 1896 to its unlamented death in 1927. Introduced by the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin, the term was used to describe an early onset of psychotic symptoms that presaged a tragic downhill course and poor outcome - as distinct from manic depressive illness, which has a more variable age of onset, cyclical course, and greater chance for a good outcome.

The label dementia praecox spread like wildfire and was briefly the darling of psychiatry until it lost out to schizophrenia, a broader concept that included milder and earlier cases and did not necessarily imply such a bleak future or bad outcome.

The defeat of one term and rise of the next resulted from a shift in diagnostic fashion promoted by leading American psychiatrists, dutifully followed by their flocks.

In retrospect, there was nothing inherently superior about either term. Schizophrenia won because it was less discouraging, implied therapy might help, was not of German origin when the US was at war with Germany and was of Swiss origin at a time when the two major figures in American psychiatry were Swiss immigrants. If it sounds arbitrary, it was. Human nature doesn't sort into neat and obvious categories.

The label schizophrenia is still with us, but hopefully not for too much longer. It is a tired, old concept that has outlived much of its usefulness. There is not one schizophrenia: more likely a hundred causes will gradually be teased out as research goes beyond description and discovers fundamental explanations.

Though set in the past, the lessons of this book are as fresh as the controversies over the new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5) and the very future of psychiatry. Like all of medicine, the history of psychiatry is a tale of faddish and false (but often temporarily useful) diagnostic theories and labels. Tracing the fate of dementia praecox provides historical perspective and keeps us on our epistemological toes. Today's psychiatric labels will one day seem just as quaint. We need them in our clinical work and research, but shouldn't be overly impressed with their explanatory value. And we should be on guard against making arbitrary changes based on frills and fashions.

Thus informed, perhaps we can avoid repeating the recursive ebbs and flows and instead achieve a rounded view of psychiatry.

Book Information
American Madness: The rise and fall of dementia praecox

by Richard Noll
Published by: Harvard University Press
?33.95/$45

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/1af0a890/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Cblogs0Cculturelab0C20A110C120Cwhy0Epsychiatrists0Eshould0Emind0Etheir0Elanguage0Bhtml0DDCMP0FOTC0Erss0Gnsref0Fonline0Enews/story01.htm

nfl power rankings week 13 patrice patrice tether lana peters lana peters jennifer nettles

Do Packers chase 16-0 or rest key players? (AP)

16-0. It could happen.

Having won their first 13 games, and with three mediocre opponents left on the schedule, the defending Super Bowl champion Green Bay Packers will try to do something no other National Football League team has done since the 1972 Miami Dolphins. And that's going undefeated, start to finish.

The Dolphins won every game and added the NFL championship, going 17-0 overall. It took another 35 years before there was a true challenger, the 2007 New England Patriots, followed by the 2009 Indianapolis Colts.

The pursuit of perfection, however, poses a dilemma ? figuring out if it's worth the chase.

The Packers will need to decide whether to stick with their stars and other regulars or rest them to prepare for the playoffs and, hopefully, another Super Bowl title.

Even within their own ranks, there is uncertainty.

"There's risk every time you take the field," says quarterback Aaron Rodgers, the favorite to win the NFL's Most Valuable Player award. "We're going to keep playing the way we're playing."

Yet linebacker Clay Matthews sees the value of playing it safe.

"We're here to win ballgames, but at the same time you don't want to compromise people's health when it comes down to trying to remain undefeated when you have your goals locked up," he said during a recent interview.

Already, there's a whiff of trouble ahead.

Top receiver Greg Jennings will miss two to three weeks with a left knee sprain, but is expected back for the playoffs, and two players sustained concussions in last Sunday's rout of Oakland.

A win Sunday against 5-8 Kansas City, which just fired coach Todd Haley, will give the Packers home-field advantage throughout the NFC playoffs. Although they lost their most recent postseason game at Lambeau Field for the 2007 NFC title against the Giants, generally the venerable stadium is a den of horrors for visitors. Not having to visit New Orleans or San Francisco in January is highly desirable for the Pack.

Once they've guaranteed that scenario, the Packers' challenge becomes how to approach the postseason. Their last two opponents, both at Lambeau, are division rivals Chicago and Detroit.

Not only are both desperate to grab a wild-card playoff spot, there's likely to be a little more incentive against the Packers.

Bears-Packers is the oldest rivalry in football, and the teams will meet on Christmas night on national TV.

Lions defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh was suspended two games for stomping on Packers guard Evan Dietrich-Smith in their Thanksgiving Day meeting.

Packers nose tackle B.J. Raji sees no benefit in holding back.

"I know coach," he said, referring to Mike McCarthy. "You don't win a Super Bowl by being scared. You just play. That's the message he's preaching. Just play the game because it's the game. That's the way you're supposed to play it. You're not supposed to be playing a game and looking at all of these scenarios of who you want to play. Generally, if you do things the right way, hopefully you get some luck in the injury thing.

"You have to respect the game of football. Obviously, we're in a great position. We're 13-0. We have a lot of things wrapped up. But ultimately you never accomplish anything great by being scared. We have an option to go either way, but if you want to make history and do some things that haven't been done in a while, you have to take a chance."

New England took the chance in 2007, Indianapolis didn't in 2009. Both got to the Super Bowl and lost.

Patriots coach Bill Belichick barely broached the subject of a perfect season even while his team was marching through its schedule. It came up during news conferences, but only when he was asked about it. It did not come up in team meetings or during game-planning sessions or during flights home from the road. According to several players from the `07 squad that went 18-0 before being stunned by the Giants in the Super Bowl, Belichick's approach never wavered.

"Even when we were 12-0 and 14-0, he always preached finishing what we started, finishing the game," said former safety Rodney Harrison, a defensive leader in New England and now an analyst on NBC.

"Bill stressed each week improving and becoming a better football team, so he never really discussed 16-0. Instead, he pointed it out on tape what we can do to get better."

Actually, the Patriots struggled a bit in the final weeks of 2007, even as they were going all-out. After routing virtually everyone in the first half of the schedule, they won three games by a field goal down the stretch, and neither playoff victory was lopsided.

Still, they've never questioned the path they chose.

"Pressure is self-inflicted. It's how you handle it," veteran running back Kevin Faulk said. "It's what we deal with. We're professional athletes. You're going to be put in pressure situations. You just did what you had to do each and every week: go out there and win a football game."

Indianapolis focused on staying healthy at the expense of making history. At 14-0 and leading the Jets 29-15 at halftime, coach Jim Caldwell sat Peyton Manning and many other regulars. The Colts dropped that one, and their final regular-season game in 2009. They turned up the heat for the playoffs, but lost to New Orleans in the Super Bowl.

Star defensive end Dwight Freeney hates the perception created by resting the starters.

"People were like, `You have the backups in there, so you're trying to lose,'" Freeney said. "You're not trying to lose.

"We didn't full throttle go after it, but we still wanted to win those games. Maybe they didn't put us in the best position or whatever, but it's not like we weren't trying to win. We were still trying to win and it didn't happen."

Green Bay is well aware of all the story lines.

"We'd like to win the Super Bowl," Matthews said. "So if that means winning every game, then so be it."

___

AP Sports Writers Chris Jenkins in Green Bay, Wis., Howard Ulman in Foxborough, Mass., and Michael Marot in Indianapolis contributed to this story.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/sports/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111214/ap_on_sp_fo_ne/fbn_packer_perfect

rocky horror picture show rutgers risky business weather nj weather nj nyc weather nyc weather

Lawyer: James Murdoch was shown hacking evidence

(AP) ? A former top lawyer for Rupert Murdoch's British newspapers insisted Wednesday that he told the mogul's son there was evidence of widespread phone hacking more than three years before a scandal over the practice erupted.

Tom Crone questioned claims made by James Murdoch ? chairman of News International, the British arm of his father's media empire ? that he had not been fully informed about an email indicating that hacking was rife.

For many months, News International insisted the illegal accessing of the cell phone voice messages of celebrities and crime victims was confined to reporter Clive Goodman who, along with private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, was jailed in 2007.

But in July the company closed the 168-year-old tabloid, amid public outrage over the disclosure that reporters had hacked the phone of a missing schoolgirl, Milly Dowler, who was later found murdered.

Crone told Britain's inquiry into media standards he was "pretty sure" that during a meeting in June 2008, he showed Murdoch a printed copy of an email that included transcripts of illegally intercepted voice mail messages.

The document is considered a key piece of evidence in proving that News International had attempted to hide the extent of the scandal from the public.

Murdoch has previously told a parliamentary committee investigating phone hacking he hadn't been told about the email.

"What was certainly discussed was the email ... and what it meant in terms of further involvement in phone hacking beyond Goodman and Mulcaire," Crone told the inquiry, referring to the June 2008 meeting.

"What was relayed to Mr. Murdoch was that this document clearly was direct and hard evidence of that being the case," he said.

Crone's evidence marks the strongest challenge yet to the testimony of the 39-year-old Murdoch to lawmakers.

Originally, Murdoch insisted he wasn't aware of the key email when he approved a payout of around 700,000 pounds ($1 million) to phone hacking victim Gordon Taylor ? a soccer executive.

But Murdoch has been contradicted both by Crone and News of the World Editor Colin Myler, who both insist they had told him about the email.

Murdoch was eventually forced to make a concession to their versions of events, acknowledging that he had been briefed on the incriminating email ? but insisting that its full importance was kept from him.

Evidence published Tuesday by parliament's culture committee has now cast doubt on that claim. A message from Crone, forwarded to Murdoch by Myler in June 2008, laid out the incriminating email's importance ? with Crone warning that the document could prompt a "nightmare scenario."

In a letter to legislators, the junior Murdoch acknowledged receiving the message ? and replying to it ? but he said he hadn't read all of it, explaining that it was sent over the weekend to his BlackBerry, meaning he would have only quickly scanned the first few sentences.

"I was not aware of evidence that pointed to widespread wrongdoing or indicated that further investigation was necessary," Murdoch said in a letter to lawmakers, dated Dec. 12, but published Tuesday.

In new evidence from the parliamentary committee released Wednesday, Crone acknowledged that the tabloid had checked electoral and birth records in a hunt for evidence that two lawyers acting for victims of phone hacking may have had an affair.

Lawyers Mark Lewis and Charlotte Harris were both also put under surveillance by the newspaper, as was lawmaker Tom Watson ? a frequent critic of the senior Murdoch.

"Neither check provided any support for the suspicion that Mr. Lewis and Ms. Harris had had or were having a relationship," Crone said in the letter to the panel of legislators, dated Dec. 11.

British Prime Minister David Cameron ordered judge Brian Leveson to head an inquiry into press standards following the disclosure that the News of the World had for years illegally eavesdropped on the voice mail messages of public figures.

Actors Hugh Grant and Sienna Miller, Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling and singer Charlotte Church are among those who have given evidence about how they have suffered press abuse.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2011-12-14-EU-Britain-Phone-Hacking/id-0834ebcacb314a63bea48b131a4784a7

light year michelle rounds michelle rounds cabin in the woods dan quayle brett favre packers stock

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Steven Spielberg Talks 'Indy 5' And 'Crystal Skull' Backlash

'I would not make a fifth movie to prove any point,' director says of 'Indiana Jones' series.
By Kevin P. Sullivan, with reporting by Josh Horowitz


Steven Spielberg
Photo: MTV News

Fans of the "Indiana Jones" movies have a complicated relationship with the series as a whole. No one knows this better than Steven Spielberg, the man who had to listen when fans cried out as the latest entry, "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull," failed to meet expectations.

Now with talk of George Lucas writing a potential fifth film, Spielberg could stand to undo what some fans saw as a bitter farewell to Indiana Jones. When the director spoke with MTV News' Josh Horowitz while promoting "The Adventures of Tintin," he explained that he would have nothing to prove with a new Indy movie.

"I already like the last 'Indy.' I loved 'Crystal Skull,' " Spielberg said. He also expanded on his reported issues with the MacGuffin, or the object in the film that drives the story, in "Crystal Skull." "Yeah, I had a difference of opinion with the MacGuffin, so to speak, which I thought was a little bit out of character with the other MacGuffins in the other three films, but I still loved the experience making it."

The fan reaction to "Crystal Skulls" reminded Spielberg of the similar backlash he faced after the release of "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom." "We had the same criticism on 'Temple of Doom.' That movie came out and it changed the whole rating system. Jack Valenti and I conspired to create the PG-13 rating system based on the number of complaints about the harshness and the heart coming out of the chest on a PG movie. I went through the same thing," he said.

To Spielberg, the general opinion about the series is split down the middle. "I think audiences think we're two for two. They love Raiders," he said. "They love Last Crusade. They don't love as much Temple of Doom or Crystal Skull." Taking that into consideration, the director still feels no requirement for a fifth film.

"I would not make a fifth movie to prove any point. If we get a good story, I'll make it. If George [Lucas] doesn't think we should make any more, I'll listen to him," Spielberg said.

Check out everything we've got on "The Adventures of Tintin."

For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com.

Related Videos

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1675881/steven-spielberg-indiana-jones-5.jhtml

clayton kershaw osu basketball dale sveum ny jets ny jets jets broncos thursday night football